Rebounding

It has been advised to me, by a few people, that a part of the healing process for a breakup is to get into a rebound relationship. A rebound relationship is a relationship that you enter into that isn't too serious, if at all. When I showed my friends a photo of my ex's new boyfriend to see whether they thought he had a punchable face (unanimous agreement: he does), they suggested that he may just be a rebound, and so maybe I should get in on that rebound plan too. It's bad advice, I think. Like, horrid advice, even if somewhat amusing. It suggests using another person. And we shouldn't use people so selfishly. 

But I wonder if I'm already doing that. Not long after my ex broke up with me, I was curious to see if she was active on Catholic Match. She was. That she put herself in a search mode so soon after our relationship hurt to see. Was I so insignificant? Was I so replaceable? So expendable? Did she even mean it when she said she loved me? I may never get answers to these questions (and I have asked her) and now I have to figure out what to do with myself and where to go from here, and it is difficult when one severs a relationship and you're in the dark as to why. It is difficult to know what to change and what to improve on when you aren't told what the problem was (grief recovery classes help, but they don't answer the fundamental questions). And with no information to work with, I too hopped onto Catholic Match, re-downloaded some dating apps, and started going out a bit more. Even had friends set up entire BBQs so that I can meet their one friend they think I would be good with (an effort I very much appreciate and will never forget). But, to what end? Is that me going on the rebound?

I don't want to be in a relationship for the sake of being in a relationship. I'm not so lonely I will take any warm body. A prostitute can fulfill that role, and I'm not buying any of them any time soon. I know a handful of Protestant girls who might like to be taken out, but I will not shame my religion in doing so (yes, Catholics dating non-Catholics is objectively shameful). I know a good Catholic woman would like to go with me but isn't open to life. I want a relationship because I think God has made that part of His plan for my salvation. And my role as a husband is to be part of someone else's plan of salvation as well. But, I know I'm broken, and I'm broken up. But how? Which parts? How can I know? Here, something of a case can be made for rebounding. I can find out what those broken parts are by trying another relationship. I can better myself, and perhaps teach the other something along way, if we decide not to stay together after all. And that is how I will know.

But again, I don't want to carry any baggage from a previous relationship into a new one, not just for myself, but to do justice to the other. That wouldn't be fair to her. So, where am I? Where does that put me? It is difficult to discern, and so I beg your prayers, all five of my readers. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Milo

Image
So I decided to go see Milo Yiannopoulos at UCSB yesterday. I was really hesitant to do so, and decided not to go, but a few of my friends wanted to go, and they're all losers who don't drive, so, I had to take everyone. I didn't know much about Milo, and I still don't, but I did learn some things. In some of the more, ahem, colorfully conservative pages of facebook that I follow, Milo has been something of an iconoclast, destroying the feminist narratives left and right. But I also know that he is an active homosexual and he is a rabid Trump supporter (even calling him "Daddy"). So, for those reasons, I was never interested in what he had to say. He was, to take a phrase from Lenin, a useful idiot. That was my impression. But I was wrong. A few days before the event, I had read somewhere on these pages I follow but wont name, that Milo believed himself to be a Christian, and a Catholic at that. I dismissed this immediately, and my opinion of him stoppe...
Read more

What Does The Bible Say About Birth Control?

From the early church up to 1930, virtually every church believed contraception was a sin. That fact alone should have us induce that contraception is in fact a sin. Yet, there are many Christians today, even in my own congregation, that will never entertain the possibility of contraception being a sin.
Read more

Is Canon 28 Binding?

In my previous post , I discussed Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon (you'll find the full text of the canon there). But I should have put an asterisk on the conversation because Canon 28 isn't properly part of the council. You'll remember from an earlier post , that what makes a council ecumenical is ratification from the Roman Pontiff. Canons are part of councils. And naturally, canons also have to be ratified. However, Canon 28 was not ratified by Pope Leo (Roman Pontiff at the time). So Canon 28 isn't part of the council and thus isn't binding.  If you are Orthodox, this may sound too convenient. I've already suggested why Roman Ratification is the correct theory in the previous link. However, I want to add two things. First, even Saints in the East agree with the Roman position, and second, a case can be made for Canon 28 not being problematic for Catholicism.  First, there are the sayings of Pope St. Gelasius (about 490 AD), and Pope St. Gelasius is...
Read more