Two Preparations for Death

 I've been reflecting on my anxiety attack, and how I thought I was moments away from death. It wasn't the first time I thought I was going to die. The other time was when I got into my car crash. There is one major difference in my experience of both those events. The first, in my car crash, I was ready to die, and accept death. It's cool to think how fast my brain went through thoughts in a split second. Some of those thoughts were, "Oh no" "Oh well" "I didn't get to say goodbye" "I'm ready for this" "I'm confident in my salvation" "I'll see Jesus and be happy". 

In my second anticipation of death, these were the thoughts that were going through my mind, as I lay on the floor, listening to my sister panic as she called the paramedics, "Oh no" "No no no" "I'm not ready" "I've done so many things I can't take back" "I'm going to hell" "I'm going to see Jesus and not be happy" "I've wasted my life" "It's too late to ask for forgiveness" "Why don't you ask now?" "No, it won't count".

In one case, I was in a state of grace, and in another, I was not. And it's pretty scary, ya know. Clearly, it was better to be in the first case than in the second. But the after effects are different. After my car accident, it was super distressing to be in a car. I couldn't be in one for a few months without having my heart skip a beat, or without giving unnecessary panicked warnings to my drivers at every turn. In this way, my life didn't get better. 

But after my anxiety attack, which really felt like a stroke, with half my body going paralyzed, things got better. I made more of an effort to maintain God's grace in my life. I reevaluated priorities. I quit my job which made me pretty happy. I decided to look at the trees and birds. Life got better. Life is better. 

God disciplines those he loves. I am very grateful for having this experience. I wouldn't want to go through it again, but I'm glad I did. Perhaps, when we feel God's grace too much, we get anxious to maintain it, and we get somewhat scrupulous about it. I became scrupulous about driving. But, when I felt God's absence, and I felt my eternal destiny in danger, that allowed me to reach out more and strengthen my relationship with God. So, God brings good out of that. And that's pretty cool.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Milo

Image
So I decided to go see Milo Yiannopoulos at UCSB yesterday. I was really hesitant to do so, and decided not to go, but a few of my friends wanted to go, and they're all losers who don't drive, so, I had to take everyone. I didn't know much about Milo, and I still don't, but I did learn some things. In some of the more, ahem, colorfully conservative pages of facebook that I follow, Milo has been something of an iconoclast, destroying the feminist narratives left and right. But I also know that he is an active homosexual and he is a rabid Trump supporter (even calling him "Daddy"). So, for those reasons, I was never interested in what he had to say. He was, to take a phrase from Lenin, a useful idiot. That was my impression. But I was wrong. A few days before the event, I had read somewhere on these pages I follow but wont name, that Milo believed himself to be a Christian, and a Catholic at that. I dismissed this immediately, and my opinion of him stoppe...
Read more

What Does The Bible Say About Birth Control?

From the early church up to 1930, virtually every church believed contraception was a sin. That fact alone should have us induce that contraception is in fact a sin. Yet, there are many Christians today, even in my own congregation, that will never entertain the possibility of contraception being a sin.
Read more

Is Canon 28 Binding?

In my previous post , I discussed Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon (you'll find the full text of the canon there). But I should have put an asterisk on the conversation because Canon 28 isn't properly part of the council. You'll remember from an earlier post , that what makes a council ecumenical is ratification from the Roman Pontiff. Canons are part of councils. And naturally, canons also have to be ratified. However, Canon 28 was not ratified by Pope Leo (Roman Pontiff at the time). So Canon 28 isn't part of the council and thus isn't binding.  If you are Orthodox, this may sound too convenient. I've already suggested why Roman Ratification is the correct theory in the previous link. However, I want to add two things. First, even Saints in the East agree with the Roman position, and second, a case can be made for Canon 28 not being problematic for Catholicism.  First, there are the sayings of Pope St. Gelasius (about 490 AD), and Pope St. Gelasius is...
Read more