A Conversation on Pride

Me:...and that's why I don't waste my time with those people.

Bob: Wow bro, that sounds pretty prideful.

Me: Prideful isn't a word. Proud.

Bob: See, that proves you're prideful.

Me: Okay, whatever. So what about that makes me proud?

Bob: You're basically saying you're smarter than they are. You need to humble yourself.

Me: Well, I don't think that's pride. Can you give me a definition of pride?

Bob: When you think you're better than somebody.

Me: Well, I don't think I'm better than they are in a moral sense or worth since we all have a corrupted human nature. But I do think it is the case that I am more informed and hence can tackle issues better than they do.

Bob: There you go. That's pride.

Me: I don't see how that is pride if it is actually true though and I am merely stating a fact. For example, if Usain Bolt said he is faster than almost everybody, I wouldn't see this is pride at all. It is a sober estimate of himself. However, if Usain Bolt said "Aw, I'm not that fast of a runner" we would consider that false humility, which is a form of pride. Pride then is an mis-estimation of one self, or more accurately perhaps, it is not recognizing the gifts that God gave you, which implies the sober estimate.

Bob: But saying you're better than someone else at something is just prideful.

Me: Well, would it offend you if I said I was faster than you?

Bob: Probably.

Me: Would it offend you if I said I was not faster than you?

Bob: No, not at all. That's being humble! 

Me: Don't you see how that is YOU being proud though?

Bob: No.

Me: What you're saying is, if I say I'm better than you at something, then I'm being proud, but I say I'm not or less than you, I'm being humble. What are you doing then is making yourself the standard of everything humble and proud. You are somehow making yourself the thing that all other things must measure against. You are making the world revolve around you. And that is an over estimation of your own worth, hence, saying I'm prideful shows that you're the one who is really prideful here.

Bob: Prideful isn't a word.

Me: Now you're getting it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Milo

Image
So I decided to go see Milo Yiannopoulos at UCSB yesterday. I was really hesitant to do so, and decided not to go, but a few of my friends wanted to go, and they're all losers who don't drive, so, I had to take everyone. I didn't know much about Milo, and I still don't, but I did learn some things. In some of the more, ahem, colorfully conservative pages of facebook that I follow, Milo has been something of an iconoclast, destroying the feminist narratives left and right. But I also know that he is an active homosexual and he is a rabid Trump supporter (even calling him "Daddy"). So, for those reasons, I was never interested in what he had to say. He was, to take a phrase from Lenin, a useful idiot. That was my impression. But I was wrong. A few days before the event, I had read somewhere on these pages I follow but wont name, that Milo believed himself to be a Christian, and a Catholic at that. I dismissed this immediately, and my opinion of him stoppe
Read more

What Does The Bible Say About Birth Control?

From the early church up to 1930, virtually every church believed contraception was a sin. That fact alone should have us induce that contraception is in fact a sin. Yet, there are many Christians today, even in my own congregation, that will never entertain the possibility of contraception being a sin.
Read more

Is Canon 28 Binding?

In my previous post , I discussed Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon (you'll find the full text of the canon there). But I should have put an asterisk on the conversation because Canon 28 isn't properly part of the council. You'll remember from an earlier post , that what makes a council ecumenical is ratification from the Roman Pontiff. Canons are part of councils. And naturally, canons also have to be ratified. However, Canon 28 was not ratified by Pope Leo (Roman Pontiff at the time). So Canon 28 isn't part of the council and thus isn't binding.  If you are Orthodox, this may sound too convenient. I've already suggested why Roman Ratification is the correct theory in the previous link. However, I want to add two things. First, even Saints in the East agree with the Roman position, and second, a case can be made for Canon 28 not being problematic for Catholicism.  First, there are the sayings of Pope St. Gelasius (about 490 AD), and Pope St. Gelasius is
Read more