Hate The Sin, And The Sinner?

Some people will often say, "Hate the sin, not the sinner." But why? Why can't I hate the sinner as well? 

What I think this slogan is doing, even if unintentionally, is that is it separating the actions from the person, which I think can't be done. If you're doing something bad, you're a bad person. If you do something bad, I make a judgment about you as a person, not some abstract action completely devoid of you. You did that action, that affects your character, and you're more likely to do that action again. Habit's become part of your character. 

It's not like, come judgment day, God throws your sins into hell, but keeps you. No, he throws you into hell. You suffer torment and wrath, your actions don't suffer torment and wrath. I might hear, "Oh, but God is a God of love." Yeah, and he's a God of hate too. The wrath God poured upon his Son ought to have gone to you. That wrath is very real and was inflicted upon a very real person. God doesn't just hate your sins, he hates you.
The arrogant cannot stand in your presence. You hate all who do wrong; - Psalm 5:5
Yes, God is love, but this is not inconsistent with love. Love wills the good for another. In order for hate to be contradictory to love, hate has to be defined as not willing the good for another. But that's not clear or obvious. There's a strong antagonistic feeling we usually express when we colloquially use the word "hate." But what then is indifference? Indifference, as it applies to relationships among persons, does not will the good (or bad) of a person. That's more contradictory to love. I think we would recognize a difference between hatred and indifference.

What is hatred, then? I have no idea. LOL I'm not sure it has to do much with a will, but an attitude or an emotional state towards a person. So, it's not contradictory to love, and it's consistent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Milo

Image
So I decided to go see Milo Yiannopoulos at UCSB yesterday. I was really hesitant to do so, and decided not to go, but a few of my friends wanted to go, and they're all losers who don't drive, so, I had to take everyone. I didn't know much about Milo, and I still don't, but I did learn some things. In some of the more, ahem, colorfully conservative pages of facebook that I follow, Milo has been something of an iconoclast, destroying the feminist narratives left and right. But I also know that he is an active homosexual and he is a rabid Trump supporter (even calling him "Daddy"). So, for those reasons, I was never interested in what he had to say. He was, to take a phrase from Lenin, a useful idiot. That was my impression. But I was wrong. A few days before the event, I had read somewhere on these pages I follow but wont name, that Milo believed himself to be a Christian, and a Catholic at that. I dismissed this immediately, and my opinion of him stoppe
Read more

What Does The Bible Say About Birth Control?

From the early church up to 1930, virtually every church believed contraception was a sin. That fact alone should have us induce that contraception is in fact a sin. Yet, there are many Christians today, even in my own congregation, that will never entertain the possibility of contraception being a sin.
Read more

Is Canon 28 Binding?

In my previous post , I discussed Canon 28 of the Council of Chalcedon (you'll find the full text of the canon there). But I should have put an asterisk on the conversation because Canon 28 isn't properly part of the council. You'll remember from an earlier post , that what makes a council ecumenical is ratification from the Roman Pontiff. Canons are part of councils. And naturally, canons also have to be ratified. However, Canon 28 was not ratified by Pope Leo (Roman Pontiff at the time). So Canon 28 isn't part of the council and thus isn't binding.  If you are Orthodox, this may sound too convenient. I've already suggested why Roman Ratification is the correct theory in the previous link. However, I want to add two things. First, even Saints in the East agree with the Roman position, and second, a case can be made for Canon 28 not being problematic for Catholicism.  First, there are the sayings of Pope St. Gelasius (about 490 AD), and Pope St. Gelasius is
Read more